Security, compliance, and validation

Governed workflow software should be clear about what is ready, configured, and still being validated.

Meteor is built for regulated operations, but implementation scope matters. This page separates current product foundations, design direction, customer-configured controls, and claims that should not be overstated.

Discuss validation scope See pilot scope

Available now

Controlled workflow foundations

Role-based workflow ownership and approval paths
Record references, timestamps, retained evidence, and audit-history design
Website security headers, cookie preferences, and consent-aware analytics
Pilot-scoped access, workflow, and evidence review before wider rollout

Designed toward

Regulated operations posture

21 CFR Part 11 and EU Annex 11 design considerations
GAMP 5-style validation planning and change-control support
Configuration review packs for workflow, role, signature, and evidence behavior
Release notes and acceptance checks for controlled product changes

Customer configured

Controls set during implementation

Identity provider, user roles, approval gates, and signature meaning
Hosting region, data retention, backup expectations, and support process
Workflow-specific SOPs, training expectations, and acceptance criteria
Integration validation for QMS, LIMS, ERP, MES, document, or identity systems

Roadmap / not yet certified

Claims handled with care

Meteor is not presented as independently certified until certification is completed
Formal customer validation packages are prepared with the rollout scope
Advanced certifications, third-party audits, and broader validation kits are roadmap items
Low-confidence AI answers and conflicting evidence should route to human review

Pilot principle

Start with one workflow, prove the controls, then expand.

For a CAPA, deviation, SOP, eSign, or training-evidence rollout, Meteor should be reviewed against your process, roles, acceptance criteria, validation expectations, and existing systems before production use.